Saltar al contenido principal

Core Improvement Proposals

The Core Improvement Proposal (CIP) sets standards for the Core platform, encompassing core protocol specifications, client APIs, and contract standards.

Contributing​

You can begin by opening your proposal under the issues section of this repository.

Review​

How to start​

Begin by contributing to the issues section of this repository. Once done, you'll be able to draft a CIP using the associated issue number (if available).

Next steps:

  1. Review the template cip-0
  2. Create a CIP in the Online Editor

Or

  1. Fork this repository.
  2. Modify the template cip-0 and move it to the cip folder.
  3. Submit a Pull Request to the Core CIP repository.

For auxiliary content, place it in the CIP image directory /static/cip/cip-x, where 'x' is the CIP number. Link images using the path /cip/cip-x/cip-x-1.png.

Tags​

  • Draft: Consideration phase for a CIP.
  • Accepted: A CIP set for immediate adoption, often slated for the next hard fork (relevant for Core/Consensus layer CIPs).
  • Final: A CIP adopted in a prior hard fork (pertinent to Core/Consensus layer CIPs).
  • Deferred: A CIP not up for immediate adoption, but might be reconsidered for future hard forks.

Categories​

CIPs are categorized into various types, each with its own list:

  • Core: Improvements involving a consensus fork or changes significant to core development discussions.
  • Networking: Enhancements concerning network protocol specs.
  • Interface: Focuses on client API/RPC specs, language standards like method names, and contract ABIs. Discussions should mainly take place in the interfaces repo before submitting a CIP here.
  • CBC: Application standards and conventions like token standards and name registries.
  • Informational: Addresses Core design issues or offers guidelines to the Core community without suggesting new features.
  • Meta: Outlines processes around Core or proposes process changes. These are more binding than informational CIPs and often require community consensus.

Channels​